<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1550 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285209</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2010-11, directing the Assessing Officer to recompute the income at 0.15% instead of 2% as previously assessed. The decision was based on precedents from similar cases involving commission income assessments. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside, and the matter was remanded for reassessment, ensuring a fair hearing for the appellant. This decision in favor of the appellant was extended to other assessment years with similar circumstances, resulting in all appeals being allowed by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 16:17:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1550 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285209</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2010-11, directing the Assessing Officer to recompute the income at 0.15% instead of 2% as previously assessed. The decision was based on precedents from similar cases involving commission income assessments. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside, and the matter was remanded for reassessment, ensuring a fair hearing for the appellant. This decision in favor of the appellant was extended to other assessment years with similar circumstances, resulting in all appeals being allowed by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>