https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390389 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding that the rejection of their tender application for flood protection work based on the absence of a month-wise GST clearance certificate, a requirement not explicitly stated in the tender notification, was unjust and arbitrary. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to conditions explicitly outlined in tender notifications and directed the respondents to issue a fresh notification with clear documentation requirements. The judgment underscores the significance of transparency and fairness in tender processes to ensure equitable treatment of bidders and prevent arbitrary rejections. en-us Mon, 30 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Jan 2020 16:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390389 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding that the rejection of their tender application for flood protection work based on the absence of a month-wise GST clearance certificate, a requirement not explicitly stated in the tender notification, was unjust and arbitrary. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to conditions explicitly outlined in tender notifications and directed the respondents to issue a fresh notification with clear documentation requirements. The judgment underscores the significance of transparency and fairness in tender processes to ensure equitable treatment of bidders and prevent arbitrary rejections. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 30 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390389