<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (11) TMI 41 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20900</link>
    <description>Expenditure on meals, coffee, tea and similar hospitality provided to customers at the factory premises was held to fall within entertainment expenditure under Explanation 2 to section 37(2A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The provision enlarges entertainment expenditure to include hospitality of every kind given by an assessee to any person, including food or beverages in any form, whether or not incurred under trade custom or usage; only food or beverages provided to employees are excluded. From 1 April 1976, the amendment made this position clear, so the disputed customer hospitality expenditure was rightly treated as entertainment expenditure and answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:36:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (11) TMI 41 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20900</link>
      <description>Expenditure on meals, coffee, tea and similar hospitality provided to customers at the factory premises was held to fall within entertainment expenditure under Explanation 2 to section 37(2A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The provision enlarges entertainment expenditure to include hospitality of every kind given by an assessee to any person, including food or beverages in any form, whether or not incurred under trade custom or usage; only food or beverages provided to employees are excluded. From 1 April 1976, the amendment made this position clear, so the disputed customer hospitality expenditure was rightly treated as entertainment expenditure and answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>