https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285190 The maxim actus curiae neminem gravabit cannot be invoked to reopen a concluded postgraduate medical admission process where the applicants were not vigilant and approached the court only after the schedule had ended. The Supreme Court of India noted that the binding admission directions for the academic year had already been implemented, and further counselling or a mop-up round beyond the cut-off date would unsettle completed admissions and create uncertainty. Claims based on vacant seats, public interest, or parity with other cases could not override the governing admission regime. The challenge to refusal of additional counselling therefore failed. en-us Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Jan 2020 14:38:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285190 The maxim actus curiae neminem gravabit cannot be invoked to reopen a concluded postgraduate medical admission process where the applicants were not vigilant and approached the court only after the schedule had ended. The Supreme Court of India noted that the binding admission directions for the academic year had already been implemented, and further counselling or a mop-up round beyond the cut-off date would unsettle completed admissions and create uncertainty. Claims based on vacant seats, public interest, or parity with other cases could not override the governing admission regime. The challenge to refusal of additional counselling therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285190