https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285181 The appellate tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, ruling that the tax liability of the appellant for the disputed period was not justified. The tribunal emphasized the importance of caution by departmental authorities in future appeals, hinting at procedural lapses in the case. The decision was based on a detailed analysis of legal arguments and precedents, ultimately supporting the appellant's position that the commission received for business auxiliary services qualified as an export of service exempt from tax under the Finance Act, 1994. en-us Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Jan 2020 14:19:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285181 The appellate tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, ruling that the tax liability of the appellant for the disputed period was not justified. The tribunal emphasized the importance of caution by departmental authorities in future appeals, hinting at procedural lapses in the case. The decision was based on a detailed analysis of legal arguments and precedents, ultimately supporting the appellant's position that the commission received for business auxiliary services qualified as an export of service exempt from tax under the Finance Act, 1994. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285181