<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (1) TMI 36 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20898</link>
    <description>The High Court determined that the payment made by the assessee to a foreign company for technical assistance and supply of drawings constituted revenue expenditure for income tax assessment purposes. The Court analyzed the collaboration agreement, nature of expenditure, and benefit derived, concluding that the payment aimed at enhancing business efficiency and profitability, rather than setting up a new industry. As the services provided were supplemental to the existing business and did not result in acquiring new assets, the expenditure was deemed revenue in nature. The ruling favored the assessee, with no costs awarded to the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:33:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (1) TMI 36 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20898</link>
      <description>The High Court determined that the payment made by the assessee to a foreign company for technical assistance and supply of drawings constituted revenue expenditure for income tax assessment purposes. The Court analyzed the collaboration agreement, nature of expenditure, and benefit derived, concluding that the payment aimed at enhancing business efficiency and profitability, rather than setting up a new industry. As the services provided were supplemental to the existing business and did not result in acquiring new assets, the expenditure was deemed revenue in nature. The ruling favored the assessee, with no costs awarded to the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>