<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (7) TMI 347 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285172</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, determining that the CIT&#039;s orders under section 263 of the IT Act and section 25(2) of the WT Act lacked material evidence and contravened the assurances of the Amnesty Scheme. The assessments under sections 143(1) of the IT Act and 16(1) of the WT Act were deemed valid, emphasizing that the CIT had exceeded jurisdiction by not adhering to CBDT circulars.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2019 18:25:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (7) TMI 347 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285172</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, determining that the CIT&#039;s orders under section 263 of the IT Act and section 25(2) of the WT Act lacked material evidence and contravened the assurances of the Amnesty Scheme. The assessments under sections 143(1) of the IT Act and 16(1) of the WT Act were deemed valid, emphasizing that the CIT had exceeded jurisdiction by not adhering to CBDT circulars.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>