https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285170 The Allahabad HC stated that Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act operates independently of Section 17(1). It held that the Government may dispense with the Section 5-A inquiry in cases of urgency once the statutory urgency conditions exist after the Section 4 notification, and that the phrase referring to Section 17(1) or Section 17(2) concerns the existence of urgency conditions, not any prior notification under Section 17(1). A prior order or notification under Section 17(1) was therefore not a condition precedent to invoking Section 17(4), and the direction issued under Section 17(4) was valid. en-us Mon, 14 Oct 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Dec 2019 16:37:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285170 The Allahabad HC stated that Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act operates independently of Section 17(1). It held that the Government may dispense with the Section 5-A inquiry in cases of urgency once the statutory urgency conditions exist after the Section 4 notification, and that the phrase referring to Section 17(1) or Section 17(2) concerns the existence of urgency conditions, not any prior notification under Section 17(1). A prior order or notification under Section 17(1) was therefore not a condition precedent to invoking Section 17(4), and the direction issued under Section 17(4) was valid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 Oct 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285170