<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1257 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390374</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition of cash deposits in the assessee&#039;s savings bank account was not justified as the deposits were explained to be from cash in hand of a company where the assessee was a majority shareholder. The Tribunal found the addition under Section 69 without proper opportunity for the assessee to be heard to be illegal and bad in law. Consequently, the addition was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2019 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1257 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390374</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition of cash deposits in the assessee&#039;s savings bank account was not justified as the deposits were explained to be from cash in hand of a company where the assessee was a majority shareholder. The Tribunal found the addition under Section 69 without proper opportunity for the assessee to be heard to be illegal and bad in law. Consequently, the addition was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>