<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1253 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390370</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order. The addition made by the AO under Section 41(1) was deleted as there was no evidence of remission or cessation of liability, and the creditors had not foregone their debts. The Tribunal found that the liabilities towards the creditors still existed, and the CIT(A)&#039;s decision was supported by relevant case law, including judgments of the Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2019 14:41:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1253 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390370</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order. The addition made by the AO under Section 41(1) was deleted as there was no evidence of remission or cessation of liability, and the creditors had not foregone their debts. The Tribunal found that the liabilities towards the creditors still existed, and the CIT(A)&#039;s decision was supported by relevant case law, including judgments of the Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>