https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285164 The Supreme Court upheld the competence of the Disciplinary Committee, finding its recommendation for dismissal within delegated authority. The Court affirmed the sufficiency of evidence for misconduct, emphasizing the judiciary's need for integrity. Allegations of bias against the Enquiry Officer were dismissed. The procedural propriety of the Committee's actions was confirmed, validating the Governor's dismissal order. The Court emphasized the High Court's control over disciplinary matters and upheld the respondent's dismissal, highlighting the importance of judicial integrity and constitutional provisions. en-us Wed, 30 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Dec 2019 12:30:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285164 The Supreme Court upheld the competence of the Disciplinary Committee, finding its recommendation for dismissal within delegated authority. The Court affirmed the sufficiency of evidence for misconduct, emphasizing the judiciary's need for integrity. Allegations of bias against the Enquiry Officer were dismissed. The procedural propriety of the Committee's actions was confirmed, validating the Governor's dismissal order. The Court emphasized the High Court's control over disciplinary matters and upheld the respondent's dismissal, highlighting the importance of judicial integrity and constitutional provisions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 30 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285164