<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (4) TMI 326 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285162</link>
    <description>Chapter XXXVI CrPC does not operate like civil limitation, because Section 473 allows cognizance after the prescribed period where delay is properly explained or where taking cognizance is necessary in the interests of justice. In complaints alleging cruelty by a husband or relatives, the court must assess delay with sensitivity to the repeated or continuing nature of the grievance. An allegation of a second marriage also disclosed an offence carrying a longer punishment, so the Section 468 bar was not applied as the High Court assumed. The High Court was therefore not justified in quashing the proceedings on limitation grounds, and the matter was to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2019 12:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (4) TMI 326 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285162</link>
      <description>Chapter XXXVI CrPC does not operate like civil limitation, because Section 473 allows cognizance after the prescribed period where delay is properly explained or where taking cognizance is necessary in the interests of justice. In complaints alleging cruelty by a husband or relatives, the court must assess delay with sensitivity to the repeated or continuing nature of the grievance. An allegation of a second marriage also disclosed an offence carrying a longer punishment, so the Section 468 bar was not applied as the High Court assumed. The High Court was therefore not justified in quashing the proceedings on limitation grounds, and the matter was to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>