<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (11) TMI 39 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20889</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that averaging debts due by the assessee is not allowed. The deduction for relief under section 84 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, should only include borrowed monies and debts due for payment at the end of the accounting period, as per rule 19(3) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The court clarified that liabilities not due for payment should not be considered in the deduction calculation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:14:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (11) TMI 39 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20889</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that averaging debts due by the assessee is not allowed. The deduction for relief under section 84 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, should only include borrowed monies and debts due for payment at the end of the accounting period, as per rule 19(3) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The court clarified that liabilities not due for payment should not be considered in the deduction calculation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>