<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1475 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285154</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the assessee&#039;s and the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the deduction of workforce expenditure was not pressed and thus dismissed. The Revenue&#039;s appeal on the allowance of the assessee&#039;s claim for depreciation on goodwill was also dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, allowing depreciation on goodwill as an intangible asset. The Tribunal emphasized that appellate authorities can entertain fresh deduction claims supported by facts, even if not made through a revised return of income, aligning with legal precedents and the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation of goodwill.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1475 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285154</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the assessee&#039;s and the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the deduction of workforce expenditure was not pressed and thus dismissed. The Revenue&#039;s appeal on the allowance of the assessee&#039;s claim for depreciation on goodwill was also dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, allowing depreciation on goodwill as an intangible asset. The Tribunal emphasized that appellate authorities can entertain fresh deduction claims supported by facts, even if not made through a revised return of income, aligning with legal precedents and the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation of goodwill.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>