<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1236 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390353</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. The addition under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS was deleted based on higher court judgments and the curative nature of the second proviso to the section. However, adhoc disallowances for office expenses were upheld due to insufficient substantiating evidence. The order was pronounced on 26.12.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2019 14:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1236 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390353</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. The addition under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS was deleted based on higher court judgments and the curative nature of the second proviso to the section. However, adhoc disallowances for office expenses were upheld due to insufficient substantiating evidence. The order was pronounced on 26.12.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>