<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1219 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390336</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) and dismissed the appeals filed by the Department. It held that the assessee successfully rebutted the presumption of unjust enrichment, with the CA Certificate and other documents serving as sufficient evidence. The Tribunal directed that the entire refund amount should be paid to the assessee and not deposited in the Consumer Welfare Fund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2019 11:16:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1219 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390336</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) and dismissed the appeals filed by the Department. It held that the assessee successfully rebutted the presumption of unjust enrichment, with the CA Certificate and other documents serving as sufficient evidence. The Tribunal directed that the entire refund amount should be paid to the assessee and not deposited in the Consumer Welfare Fund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>