<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Adjudicating authority criticized for bias in clandestine removal case; demands set aside due to improper consideration.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50945</link>
    <description>Clandestine removal - the adjudicating authority is opined to have acted solely to confirm demands mechanically with predetermined negative mind because of his bias and prejudice and no willingness to appreciate the facts and records and apply the law correctly - Demand set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2019 10:15:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2019 10:15:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Adjudicating authority criticized for bias in clandestine removal case; demands set aside due to improper consideration.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50945</link>
      <description>Clandestine removal - the adjudicating authority is opined to have acted solely to confirm demands mechanically with predetermined negative mind because of his bias and prejudice and no willingness to appreciate the facts and records and apply the law correctly - Demand set aside.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2019 10:15:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>