<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1214 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390331</link>
    <description>Default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC is available only if the accused enforces the right after expiry of the prescribed period and before filing of the charge sheet; where the bail application and charge sheet are filed on the same day, the right is not established. In GST-related allegations involving fake invoicing and substantial revenue loss, arrest under Section 69 of the CGST Act is not invalid merely because the authorisation does not reproduce reasons, if the record shows the Commissioner&#039;s satisfaction. Alleged non-compliance with arrest safeguards and absence of sanction were treated as insufficient to displace the gravity of the accusations. Bail was rejected, with liberty to pursue compounding if available in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 14:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1214 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390331</link>
      <description>Default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC is available only if the accused enforces the right after expiry of the prescribed period and before filing of the charge sheet; where the bail application and charge sheet are filed on the same day, the right is not established. In GST-related allegations involving fake invoicing and substantial revenue loss, arrest under Section 69 of the CGST Act is not invalid merely because the authorisation does not reproduce reasons, if the record shows the Commissioner&#039;s satisfaction. Alleged non-compliance with arrest safeguards and absence of sanction were treated as insufficient to displace the gravity of the accusations. Bail was rejected, with liberty to pursue compounding if available in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>