<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1210 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390327</link>
    <description>The Court held that the reopening of assessment for the assessment year 2012-13, based on alleged bogus purchases and accommodation entries, lacked jurisdictional requirements. The Assessing Officer&#039;s actions were deemed to be a change of opinion, as the issues had been previously considered. The Court found that all material facts were fully disclosed, rendering the reopening invalid. Consequently, the writ petition was allowed, and the impugned notices were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Dec 2019 10:14:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1210 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390327</link>
      <description>The Court held that the reopening of assessment for the assessment year 2012-13, based on alleged bogus purchases and accommodation entries, lacked jurisdictional requirements. The Assessing Officer&#039;s actions were deemed to be a change of opinion, as the issues had been previously considered. The Court found that all material facts were fully disclosed, rendering the reopening invalid. Consequently, the writ petition was allowed, and the impugned notices were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>