<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1185 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390302</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the issue of disallowance of derivative loss back to the Assessing Officer for re-examination, directing the assessee to provide correct broker details. The challenge against interest charges under sections 234A and 234B was dismissed as consequential. The deletion of addition under section 68 was upheld, with the Tribunal affirming the assessee&#039;s fulfillment of onus regarding the transactions&#039; genuineness. The order was pronounced on 9th December 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2020 14:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1185 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390302</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the issue of disallowance of derivative loss back to the Assessing Officer for re-examination, directing the assessee to provide correct broker details. The challenge against interest charges under sections 234A and 234B was dismissed as consequential. The deletion of addition under section 68 was upheld, with the Tribunal affirming the assessee&#039;s fulfillment of onus regarding the transactions&#039; genuineness. The order was pronounced on 9th December 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>