<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1177 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390294</link>
    <description>Property inherited after the commencement of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 devolves on heirs in their individual capacity and not as continuing HUF property; accordingly, capital gains arising from such property are taxable in the heirs&#039; individual hands. Because the lower authorities had disallowed sections 54F and 54B claims mainly on the mistaken HUF premise, those exemption claims required fresh examination on their own factual and statutory merits, and the matter was restored for reconsideration. The claimed sale-related expenditure was disallowed where no supporting evidence was produced, so that disallowance was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2019 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1177 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390294</link>
      <description>Property inherited after the commencement of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 devolves on heirs in their individual capacity and not as continuing HUF property; accordingly, capital gains arising from such property are taxable in the heirs&#039; individual hands. Because the lower authorities had disallowed sections 54F and 54B claims mainly on the mistaken HUF premise, those exemption claims required fresh examination on their own factual and statutory merits, and the matter was restored for reconsideration. The claimed sale-related expenditure was disallowed where no supporting evidence was produced, so that disallowance was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>