<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1160 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390277</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner to file a representation challenging the blocking of their credit account due to alleged dealings with a non-existing entity. The court instructed the respondent to promptly decide on the representation to avoid inconvenience to the petitioner in filing returns, ultimately disposing of the writ petition with these directions to resolve the issue efficiently.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1160 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390277</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner to file a representation challenging the blocking of their credit account due to alleged dealings with a non-existing entity. The court instructed the respondent to promptly decide on the representation to avoid inconvenience to the petitioner in filing returns, ultimately disposing of the writ petition with these directions to resolve the issue efficiently.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>