https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285124 Proof of signature or handwriting under Section 67 of the Indian Evidence Act establishes only authorship of a document and does not by itself prove the truth of its contents. Where the witness had no personal knowledge of the contents and the persons competent to speak to them were not called, the documents could not be treated as proved for the purpose for which they were tendered. Mere admission of such documents with a reservation as to contents was held to be of no practical value, and the objection to their admission was upheld. en-us Sat, 17 Sep 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Dec 2019 14:32:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285124 Proof of signature or handwriting under Section 67 of the Indian Evidence Act establishes only authorship of a document and does not by itself prove the truth of its contents. Where the witness had no personal knowledge of the contents and the persons competent to speak to them were not called, the documents could not be treated as proved for the purpose for which they were tendered. Mere admission of such documents with a reservation as to contents was held to be of no practical value, and the objection to their admission was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 17 Sep 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285124