<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1146 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390263</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order demanding duty from the appellant, a bona fide purchaser of DEPB scrips, which were later found to be forged. It held that duty cannot be imposed on purchasers acting in good faith, aligning with legal precedents. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, providing necessary relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1146 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390263</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order demanding duty from the appellant, a bona fide purchaser of DEPB scrips, which were later found to be forged. It held that duty cannot be imposed on purchasers acting in good faith, aligning with legal precedents. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, providing necessary relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>