<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1134 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390251</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer to be invalid due to the lack of specificity in the penalty notice, thereby allowing the appeals of the assessees. The Tribunal refrained from adjudicating other grounds raised by the assessees, as the quashing of the penalty proceedings sufficed to resolve the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2019 06:55:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1134 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390251</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer to be invalid due to the lack of specificity in the penalty notice, thereby allowing the appeals of the assessees. The Tribunal refrained from adjudicating other grounds raised by the assessees, as the quashing of the penalty proceedings sufficed to resolve the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>