<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1127 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390244</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order. It concluded that subsequent taxability of services does not automatically classify them as &#039;exempted services&#039; under Rule 2(e) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, and the demand for reversal of CENVAT credit was unsustainable. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a clear legislative measure to isolate the value of any purported exempted service, which was absent in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2019 06:51:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1127 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390244</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order. It concluded that subsequent taxability of services does not automatically classify them as &#039;exempted services&#039; under Rule 2(e) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, and the demand for reversal of CENVAT credit was unsustainable. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a clear legislative measure to isolate the value of any purported exempted service, which was absent in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>