<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1783 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285116</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not sustainable due to the lack of specific charges and the denial of a reasonable opportunity to the assessee. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, ordering the deletion of the penalty amounting to Rs. 7,72,000. The decision was rendered on October 3, 2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2019 06:51:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1783 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285116</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not sustainable due to the lack of specific charges and the denial of a reasonable opportunity to the assessee. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, ordering the deletion of the penalty amounting to Rs. 7,72,000. The decision was rendered on October 3, 2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>