<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1446 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285111</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax lacked jurisdiction to pass the assessment order, rendering it null and void. As a result, the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the relevant assessment years were also annulled. The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, emphasizing the absence of proper jurisdictional authority for the Additional Commissioner to act as an Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2019 17:48:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1446 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285111</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax lacked jurisdiction to pass the assessment order, rendering it null and void. As a result, the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the relevant assessment years were also annulled. The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, emphasizing the absence of proper jurisdictional authority for the Additional Commissioner to act as an Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>