<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1693 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285107</link>
    <description>A Section 7 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was admitted because the applicant established financial debt, default, and completion of all filing requirements through loan, restructuring, account and security records. The Tribunal held that borrowing against consideration for time value of money satisfied the definition of financial debt, and that a financial creditor could proceed independently. Pendency of winding-up proceedings did not bar admission until final dissolution, and private consortium arrangements could not override the Code. The proposed interim resolution professional was also found free from disciplinary proceedings, so the corporate insolvency resolution process commenced with moratorium and public announcement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2020 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1693 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285107</link>
      <description>A Section 7 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was admitted because the applicant established financial debt, default, and completion of all filing requirements through loan, restructuring, account and security records. The Tribunal held that borrowing against consideration for time value of money satisfied the definition of financial debt, and that a financial creditor could proceed independently. Pendency of winding-up proceedings did not bar admission until final dissolution, and private consortium arrangements could not override the Code. The proposed interim resolution professional was also found free from disciplinary proceedings, so the corporate insolvency resolution process commenced with moratorium and public announcement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>