<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1435 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285109</link>
    <description>HUF-based partition and possession claims require specific material pleadings establishing the legal basis of the alleged HUF and the character of each property. Mere assertions that property is ancestral or that a joint Hindu family exists are insufficient after the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Where inheritance before 1956 is relied upon, pleadings must identify that inheritance; where a post-1956 HUF is alleged, they must state when and how self-acquired property was thrown into the common hotchpotch. Clear foundational facts are also necessary where title stands in an individual&#039;s name. Without such facts, an HUF-based partition claim does not disclose a sustainable cause of action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2019 17:46:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1435 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285109</link>
      <description>HUF-based partition and possession claims require specific material pleadings establishing the legal basis of the alleged HUF and the character of each property. Mere assertions that property is ancestral or that a joint Hindu family exists are insufficient after the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Where inheritance before 1956 is relied upon, pleadings must identify that inheritance; where a post-1956 HUF is alleged, they must state when and how self-acquired property was thrown into the common hotchpotch. Clear foundational facts are also necessary where title stands in an individual&#039;s name. Without such facts, an HUF-based partition claim does not disclose a sustainable cause of action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>