<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1112 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390229</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on all three issues, directing the deletion of the additions made by the lower authorities. The appellant successfully argued against the method of estimating profits, the addition related to closing stock without considering opening stock, and the unexplained investment amount. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant&#039;s compliance with statutory provisions and the sufficient explanation provided for the sources of income and funds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2019 07:26:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1112 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390229</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on all three issues, directing the deletion of the additions made by the lower authorities. The appellant successfully argued against the method of estimating profits, the addition related to closing stock without considering opening stock, and the unexplained investment amount. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant&#039;s compliance with statutory provisions and the sufficient explanation provided for the sources of income and funds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>