<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1105 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390222</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that once the genuineness of the expenses is established, the AO cannot question the wage rates decided by the assessee. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s findings and directed the AO to delete the disallowance of Rs. 47,07,974/-. As a result, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the disallowance was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2019 06:59:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1105 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390222</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that once the genuineness of the expenses is established, the AO cannot question the wage rates decided by the assessee. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s findings and directed the AO to delete the disallowance of Rs. 47,07,974/-. As a result, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the disallowance was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>