<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1083 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390200</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the availability of the remedy of appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017, rejecting the appellant&#039;s argument regarding the impact of non obstante clauses in other sections. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to legislative provisions without reading additional meanings into them. The appeal was dismissed, and the time granted to prefer the appeal was extended by four weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 16:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1083 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390200</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the availability of the remedy of appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017, rejecting the appellant&#039;s argument regarding the impact of non obstante clauses in other sections. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to legislative provisions without reading additional meanings into them. The appeal was dismissed, and the time granted to prefer the appeal was extended by four weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>