<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (8) TMI 27 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20843</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay found that the adjustment of Rs. 2,25,000 made under section 143(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was not justified and set it aside. The court directed the respondents to issue a fresh intimation in compliance with the law and relevant precedent. Consequently, the claim for additional tax under section 143(1A) was also set aside, granting relief to the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:32:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (8) TMI 27 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20843</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay found that the adjustment of Rs. 2,25,000 made under section 143(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was not justified and set it aside. The court directed the respondents to issue a fresh intimation in compliance with the law and relevant precedent. Consequently, the claim for additional tax under section 143(1A) was also set aside, granting relief to the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>