https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390196 The High Court questioned the Central Administrative Tribunal's order allowing consideration of a case for appointment to the post of Member, ITAT despite delays in receiving APARs. It upheld the Selection Committee's decision to only consider applications received by the due date, emphasizing the importance of complete applications. The Court rejected allegations of mala fide action by the department and allowed the respondent to represent their grievance to the Committee. The writ petition was disposed of with instructions for the Committee to review any representations within three days, highlighting the significance of adherence to application deadlines and complete submissions in recruitment processes. en-us Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Dec 2019 15:44:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390196 The High Court questioned the Central Administrative Tribunal's order allowing consideration of a case for appointment to the post of Member, ITAT despite delays in receiving APARs. It upheld the Selection Committee's decision to only consider applications received by the due date, emphasizing the importance of complete applications. The Court rejected allegations of mala fide action by the department and allowed the respondent to represent their grievance to the Committee. The writ petition was disposed of with instructions for the Committee to review any representations within three days, highlighting the significance of adherence to application deadlines and complete submissions in recruitment processes. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390196