<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (2) TMI 68 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20841</link>
    <description>Section 40A(7) allowed deduction of the contribution to a recognised gratuity fund where the liability was computed on actuarial basis within the statutory and fund-rule limits; exclusion of employees with less than five years&#039; service was not justified on the facts. Ex gratia payment was deductible as customary bonus under section 36(1)(ii) because the assessee showed a long-standing, uniform practice, payment in loss years, and a settled industrial basis supporting reasonableness. However, the same payment could not alternatively be claimed under section 37(1), as the residuary provision cannot be used where a specific deduction provision applies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:26:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (2) TMI 68 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20841</link>
      <description>Section 40A(7) allowed deduction of the contribution to a recognised gratuity fund where the liability was computed on actuarial basis within the statutory and fund-rule limits; exclusion of employees with less than five years&#039; service was not justified on the facts. Ex gratia payment was deductible as customary bonus under section 36(1)(ii) because the assessee showed a long-standing, uniform practice, payment in loss years, and a settled industrial basis supporting reasonableness. However, the same payment could not alternatively be claimed under section 37(1), as the residuary provision cannot be used where a specific deduction provision applies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>