<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1070 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390187</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the immediate release of the seized goods based on the classification dispute and the substantial deposit already made, deeming it sufficient for provisional release. The decision highlighted the importance of aligning conditions with legal precedents and ensuring fairness in provisional release procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2019 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1070 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390187</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the immediate release of the seized goods based on the classification dispute and the substantial deposit already made, deeming it sufficient for provisional release. The decision highlighted the importance of aligning conditions with legal precedents and ensuring fairness in provisional release procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>