<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (9) TMI 77 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285079</link>
    <description>A Small Cause Court judgment may be brief under Order 20 Rule 4 CPC, but it must still state intelligible grounds showing the basis of decision. For revisional scrutiny, the order must disclose at least some reasoning so the High Court can see whether it is according to law; a bare recital of findings is insufficient, especially where mixed questions of law and fact are involved. The impugned order was therefore not a judgment in law, was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision according to law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2019 11:30:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (9) TMI 77 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285079</link>
      <description>A Small Cause Court judgment may be brief under Order 20 Rule 4 CPC, but it must still state intelligible grounds showing the basis of decision. For revisional scrutiny, the order must disclose at least some reasoning so the High Court can see whether it is according to law; a bare recital of findings is insufficient, especially where mixed questions of law and fact are involved. The impugned order was therefore not a judgment in law, was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision according to law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>