<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1691 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285076</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Central Board of Goods and Service Tax Department&#039;s application for inclusion of its claim as an Operational Creditor of the Corporate Debtor, despite the claim being filed after the stipulated deadlines. A crucial amendment permitted claims submission until the approval of the resolution plan by the committee of creditors, which occurred post the initial deadline. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to claim submission timelines but recognized the necessity of reconciling claims accurately. The decision highlighted the balance between regulatory compliance and practical considerations in insolvency resolution processes, emphasizing meticulous claim collation procedures for fair proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2019 10:17:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1691 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285076</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Central Board of Goods and Service Tax Department&#039;s application for inclusion of its claim as an Operational Creditor of the Corporate Debtor, despite the claim being filed after the stipulated deadlines. A crucial amendment permitted claims submission until the approval of the resolution plan by the committee of creditors, which occurred post the initial deadline. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to claim submission timelines but recognized the necessity of reconciling claims accurately. The decision highlighted the balance between regulatory compliance and practical considerations in insolvency resolution processes, emphasizing meticulous claim collation procedures for fair proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>