<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1054 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390171</link>
    <description>The High Court of Allahabad held that writ petitions can be filed against orders of the First Appellate Court under the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. In a particular case, the Court found the petition deficient in required deposits under Section 112(8)(a) and (b) of the Act, leading to its postponement until the petitioner rectified the issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2019 16:49:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1054 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390171</link>
      <description>The High Court of Allahabad held that writ petitions can be filed against orders of the First Appellate Court under the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. In a particular case, the Court found the petition deficient in required deposits under Section 112(8)(a) and (b) of the Act, leading to its postponement until the petitioner rectified the issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>