<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1051 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390168</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the Petitioners to pay 50% of the outstanding GST liability and secure the remaining 50% with a bank guarantee. The court emphasized prompt payment of additional license fees and allowed the Petitioners to challenge them through legal channels. An interim order was issued for future GST liabilities, with ongoing monitoring scheduled to ensure compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2019 16:45:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1051 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390168</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the Petitioners to pay 50% of the outstanding GST liability and secure the remaining 50% with a bank guarantee. The court emphasized prompt payment of additional license fees and allowed the Petitioners to challenge them through legal channels. An interim order was issued for future GST liabilities, with ongoing monitoring scheduled to ensure compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>