<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1050 - TRIPURA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390167</link>
    <description>Under the GST detention and release framework for goods in transit, tax or penalty cannot be determined or enforced as a condition for release without prior notice and an opportunity of hearing. The court noted that the statutory scheme allows interception, detention, seizure and conditional release, but requires notice specifying the liability and a hearing before any tax, interest or penalty is fixed. A pre-release demand of tax and maximum penalty passed without hearing the dealer breached this mandatory procedure and could not be sustained. The demand order was quashed, and a fresh hearing was required before any final determination of liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 14:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1050 - TRIPURA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390167</link>
      <description>Under the GST detention and release framework for goods in transit, tax or penalty cannot be determined or enforced as a condition for release without prior notice and an opportunity of hearing. The court noted that the statutory scheme allows interception, detention, seizure and conditional release, but requires notice specifying the liability and a hearing before any tax, interest or penalty is fixed. A pre-release demand of tax and maximum penalty passed without hearing the dealer breached this mandatory procedure and could not be sustained. The demand order was quashed, and a fresh hearing was required before any final determination of liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>