<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1047 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390164</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the writ petition by directing respondents No.2 &amp;amp; No.3 to review the petitioner&#039;s representation within one month. The petitioner was instructed to submit relevant documents to the mentioned respondents. The court clarified that this direction was to address the grievance promptly and not to dictate the decision&#039;s outcome. The stay application was also resolved in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2019 16:30:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1047 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390164</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the writ petition by directing respondents No.2 &amp;amp; No.3 to review the petitioner&#039;s representation within one month. The petitioner was instructed to submit relevant documents to the mentioned respondents. The court clarified that this direction was to address the grievance promptly and not to dictate the decision&#039;s outcome. The stay application was also resolved in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>