<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1046 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390163</link>
    <description>The court found in favor of the petitioner in a case concerning the unlawful seizure and detention of goods under Section 129 of the CGST Act. The court held that the reason provided in the detention notice was not valid for detaining goods in transit, as per the provisions of the Act. Consequently, the court quashed the detention notice and directed the respondents to release the consignment to the petitioner upon presentation of a copy of the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2019 16:30:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1046 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390163</link>
      <description>The court found in favor of the petitioner in a case concerning the unlawful seizure and detention of goods under Section 129 of the CGST Act. The court held that the reason provided in the detention notice was not valid for detaining goods in transit, as per the provisions of the Act. Consequently, the court quashed the detention notice and directed the respondents to release the consignment to the petitioner upon presentation of a copy of the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>