<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1039 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390156</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of penalty under section 271(1)(c) for disallowance of bonus provision, citing lack of merit and tax effect below the limit. The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding penalty for non-disclosure of profits from the Sri Lanka branch, emphasizing debatable tax issues and the bona fide belief of the assessee. The judgments were pronounced on December 20, 2019, with the Revenue&#039;s appeal dismissed and the assessee&#039;s appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2019 08:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1039 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390156</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of penalty under section 271(1)(c) for disallowance of bonus provision, citing lack of merit and tax effect below the limit. The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding penalty for non-disclosure of profits from the Sri Lanka branch, emphasizing debatable tax issues and the bona fide belief of the assessee. The judgments were pronounced on December 20, 2019, with the Revenue&#039;s appeal dismissed and the assessee&#039;s appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>