https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285063 Disqualification under Section 49(2) of the Gujarat Panchayats Act could not be imposed automatically after removal under Section 49(1) without a separate notice, hearing and inquiry, so that order was quashed. The statutory delegation under Section 321(4)(iii) and the broad appellate scope under Section 290 were treated as valid, and the challenge on that ground failed. The plea of bias and breach of natural justice was rejected because no timely objection was raised and no disqualifying personal interest was shown. The petitioner's dismissal of sweepers and refusal to obey reinstatement directions constituted misconduct and ultra vires conduct, sustaining removal. The notice by the acting District Development Officer was also upheld. en-us Wed, 21 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Dec 2019 10:30:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285063 Disqualification under Section 49(2) of the Gujarat Panchayats Act could not be imposed automatically after removal under Section 49(1) without a separate notice, hearing and inquiry, so that order was quashed. The statutory delegation under Section 321(4)(iii) and the broad appellate scope under Section 290 were treated as valid, and the challenge on that ground failed. The plea of bias and breach of natural justice was rejected because no timely objection was raised and no disqualifying personal interest was shown. The petitioner's dismissal of sweepers and refusal to obey reinstatement directions constituted misconduct and ultra vires conduct, sustaining removal. The notice by the acting District Development Officer was also upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285063