<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (7) TMI 66 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285062</link>
    <description>Railway disciplinary rules permit departmental action for serious misconduct connected with an employee&#039;s role in a railway employees&#039; co-operative society. Misconduct is not confined to working hours or direct employment duties: off-duty conduct may warrant action where it prejudices the employer&#039;s interests, conflicts with faithful service, or makes continued employment unsafe. A subsidiary rule made by the General Manager is treated as implementing, rather than expanding or restricting, disciplinary powers under the principal rules. A factual dispute over whether an employee held the treasurer&#039;s position during the charged period requires examination in the disciplinary enquiry rather than writ proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2019 10:26:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (7) TMI 66 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285062</link>
      <description>Railway disciplinary rules permit departmental action for serious misconduct connected with an employee&#039;s role in a railway employees&#039; co-operative society. Misconduct is not confined to working hours or direct employment duties: off-duty conduct may warrant action where it prejudices the employer&#039;s interests, conflicts with faithful service, or makes continued employment unsafe. A subsidiary rule made by the General Manager is treated as implementing, rather than expanding or restricting, disciplinary powers under the principal rules. A factual dispute over whether an employee held the treasurer&#039;s position during the charged period requires examination in the disciplinary enquiry rather than writ proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>