<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1018 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390135</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the exclusion of material costs from the gross value for Service Tax calculation in line with relevant Notifications and legal precedents. The judgment provided clarity on the treatment of material costs in composite contracts for Service Tax purposes, ensuring a fair and accurate assessment of tax liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2019 10:04:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1018 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390135</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the exclusion of material costs from the gross value for Service Tax calculation in line with relevant Notifications and legal precedents. The judgment provided clarity on the treatment of material costs in composite contracts for Service Tax purposes, ensuring a fair and accurate assessment of tax liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>