<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1012 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390129</link>
    <description>Rule 3 of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 was read with section 121(c) of the Finance Act, 2019 to assess whether the circular dated 25.09.2019 treated the relevant cut-off date and the category of &quot;amount in arrears&quot; consistently with the Scheme. The clarification in clauses (vii) and (viii) was regarded as compatible with the Scheme because a case may enter the arrears category once the underlying order attains finality or the appeal period expires, and the 30.06.2019 cut-off does not operate uniformly across every Rule 3 category. The circular was therefore considered to conform to the Scheme and the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1012 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390129</link>
      <description>Rule 3 of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 was read with section 121(c) of the Finance Act, 2019 to assess whether the circular dated 25.09.2019 treated the relevant cut-off date and the category of &quot;amount in arrears&quot; consistently with the Scheme. The clarification in clauses (vii) and (viii) was regarded as compatible with the Scheme because a case may enter the arrears category once the underlying order attains finality or the appeal period expires, and the 30.06.2019 cut-off does not operate uniformly across every Rule 3 category. The circular was therefore considered to conform to the Scheme and the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>