https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285054 An application under Section 482 CrPC was found maintainable because the complaint alleged a wider course of conduct extending beyond the auction purchase, including illegal mining, sham entities, routing of illicit gains, and purchase of sugar mills in different districts of Uttar Pradesh. On that footing, the cause of action was treated as spread across several places within the State, so the Delhi trial court seat did not oust jurisdiction. The complaint also disclosed a prima facie case, the summoning order rested on investigation material, and disputed factual questions were left for trial rather than decided in quashing proceedings. No ground was found to interfere with the summoning order or quash the criminal complaint. en-us Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Dec 2019 17:53:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285054 An application under Section 482 CrPC was found maintainable because the complaint alleged a wider course of conduct extending beyond the auction purchase, including illegal mining, sham entities, routing of illicit gains, and purchase of sugar mills in different districts of Uttar Pradesh. On that footing, the cause of action was treated as spread across several places within the State, so the Delhi trial court seat did not oust jurisdiction. The complaint also disclosed a prima facie case, the summoning order rested on investigation material, and disputed factual questions were left for trial rather than decided in quashing proceedings. No ground was found to interfere with the summoning order or quash the criminal complaint. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285054